Wednesday, August 23, 2006
Consumption Tax
I liked the discussion about consumption tax so much, I felt the need to post about it. I found this objective description of consumption tax on an economics site because I couldn't think of much If a downside. It turns out, there isn't much of one. Let's take a look:
Pros
Cons
Here's a decent criticism of it. The author mostly criticizes the VAT, which is obviously a bad idea since many Europeans do it. He also misses the key point of exclusions for necessities.
Hey, who knows? Maybe we could even reduce the size of the IRS!
Pros
- Increased tax base. As SheaHeyKid points out we can collect from organized crime and illegal aliens.
- Simplified tax code
- Discourage those on public assistance from buying luxury items (See Fredo's comment)
- Encourages savings, especially for those who should save
- Taxes what you take out rather than what you put in
- Good for the environment? Discourages disposable products?
Cons
- (Help me out here)
Here's a decent criticism of it. The author mostly criticizes the VAT, which is obviously a bad idea since many Europeans do it. He also misses the key point of exclusions for necessities.
Hey, who knows? Maybe we could even reduce the size of the IRS!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Always sniffing for the truth
Contributors
Links
- Love and Lunchmeat
- Long Island Prepper
- Fredo's Mets Blog
- Continental Sausage
- Human Events
- Maker's Mark
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Newt Gingrich
- NRO
- Pro Ecclesia
- Ralfy's Whisky Reviews
- Red Albany
- Res Publica et Cetera
- Sour Mash Manifesto
- Straight Bourbon
- Taki Mag
- The American Conservative
- The American Spectator
- The Anchoress Online
- The Politico
- The Weekly Standard
- Wild Turkey Bourbon
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(167)
-
▼
August
(18)
- AMSOL "Controversy" Revisited
- Bright and Uncommenty
- 2008 GOP update
- Consumption Tax
- Warms the curmudgeonly heart
- Be Like Mike Pat
- Sir Winston
- Stunning
- Sen. Allen steps in it
- Conceived in the USA, Made in China
- Code Red
- Islamist treason on the home front?
- Kristol a conservative?
- Joe Lieberman (I, CT)
- Rudy Watch: Rudy Giuliani - RINO and CINO?
- In which I choke on my own disbelief
- These are not the Egyptians you're looking for...
- Party of two, your table is broken
-
▼
August
(18)
2 comments:
I remember reading somewhere that the IRS costs ~$2B / yr to run. Anything we can do to reduce that unnecessary waste is a win!
Without the IRS, how would the once and (possibly) future Clinton White House intimidate their political opponents?