Monday, October 10, 2011
Foreign Policy: Huntsman vs. Romney
An interesting contrast is developing. Read more about it here.
One key way in which their differing world views show up in policy:
One key way in which their differing world views show up in policy:
Huntsman, unlike Romney, is open and eager to find cuts in the defense budget. The difference could create a powerful point of debate between the two given the economic focus of the election and the interest in cutting waste from government spending. When they were considering presidential runs, both Haley Barbour and Mitch Daniels unapologetically favored thorough reviews of the defense budget and wanted to see cuts. Without the pair of fiscally conservative governors in the race, the primary has lacked much discussion of the issue. But with Huntsman’s and Romney’s differing visions, it could crop up on Tuesday.
Labels:
2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Always sniffing for the truth
Contributors
Links
- Love and Lunchmeat
- Long Island Prepper
- Fredo's Mets Blog
- Continental Sausage
- Human Events
- Maker's Mark
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Newt Gingrich
- NRO
- Pro Ecclesia
- Ralfy's Whisky Reviews
- Red Albany
- Res Publica et Cetera
- Sour Mash Manifesto
- Straight Bourbon
- Taki Mag
- The American Conservative
- The American Spectator
- The Anchoress Online
- The Politico
- The Weekly Standard
- Wild Turkey Bourbon
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(148)
-
▼
October
(15)
- Peter Schiff vs. #ows
- Currently residing in the "where are they now file...
- Scouting trip coming up...
- SHK, ManBeast, Beetz and Caribou are WEAK
- Here comes the howling
- Mitt on Kasich's Ohio reforms
- Moves Like Jabba | Break.com
- A great blog
- Foreign Policy: Huntsman vs. Romney
- Ain't it fun
- Fredo's Mad Money Challenge '12, Part 1
- Palin to supporters: "Nyet!"
- The field is almost set
- For the 3rd straight cycle
- Christie to announce his intentions at 1 PM
-
▼
October
(15)
1 comments:
With Christie throwing his (considerable)* weight behind Romney's campaign, the nomination is all but Romney's to lose.
In all seriousness, that's an absolute slam dunk win for Romney. Especially since Christie was willing to offer it so quickly after announcing he wouldn't run. Rather than sitting on the sidelines--which would suggest dissatisfaction with the current crop and thus a lukewarm endorsement at best in the future--he came right out and pulled for Romney with no hesitation.
*In the words of the late, great John Belushi, sorry.