Friday, January 25, 2013
A real War on Women
I'm pretty sure that all but the most naive and passionate feminists understood the War on Women for what it was: a cynical ploy to gin up female votes for Obama. After all, if a true "War on Women" was being waged by the GOP, wouldn't President Obama and Senate Majority Leader Reid be waging that war with abandon, seeing as it is (presumably) savaging its intended targets, who also happen to be half the country? Wouldn't the President move Heaven and Earth to end the onslaught?
Instead, since the election, it's (predictably) been tax increases, gun control, climate change. Thanks for the votes, ladies. We'll see you (along with some new sense of crisis) in about 3 1/2 years. By then, you'll be taxed a bit more and making a bit less in real terms, but hey, that's just a political two-fer. Our "War on Women" and "War on the Poor" narratives will both be coming straight at you.
In the meantime, if anyone's actually interested to see what a real War on Women looks like, here's a look. It ain't pretty.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AddThis
Always sniffing for the truth
Contributors
Links
- Love and Lunchmeat
- Long Island Prepper
- Fredo's Mets Blog
- Continental Sausage
- Human Events
- Maker's Mark
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Newt Gingrich
- NRO
- Pro Ecclesia
- Ralfy's Whisky Reviews
- Red Albany
- Res Publica et Cetera
- Sour Mash Manifesto
- Straight Bourbon
- Taki Mag
- The American Conservative
- The American Spectator
- The Anchoress Online
- The Politico
- The Weekly Standard
- Wild Turkey Bourbon
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(51)
-
▼
January
(8)
- Matt Lewis: Rand Paul should not run in 2016
- Taxes matter: Wall Street heads to Florida
- Somebody better be tasting Mamet's food
- A real War on Women
- Religious Liberty Clinic at Stanford Law School
- Jindal's way forward for the GOP
- Reagan Warned Us About Obama
- Follow This Example and Be Understanding with Your...
-
▼
January
(8)
0 comments: