Monday, November 05, 2007

Wall Street going Dem

Believe it, says the WSJ. This article's about a month old, but I missed posting it before, and it's a central theme to this year's election cycle, which is increasingly busting up and reformulating the political map.

2 comments:

SheaHeyKid said...

There is no question that a 3rd party candidate who is business savvy and pledges a strong focus on cutting taxes and spending would kill the Republicans chances in '08. This is the risk of a Bloomberg (or similar) run.

Republicans have shot themselves in the foot with fiscal conservatives by running up spending under Bush, and Bush's failure to appear in control or a strong leader. FiCons want someone who is in control, will cut taxes and spending, and articulate his positions well. They also want someone who will try to maintain as good relations with foreign countries as possible (to help them when they do business overseas). Bush has been solid on taxes but not on the rest.

I don't think FiCons will care if the nominee also has a strong SoCon agenda, so long as a balanced budget with lower spending is also clearly a priority. This is where I think Mitt could be the candidate to unite all elements of the party, assuming Evangelicals can get on board to vote for him.

At the end of the day though business often supports what's best for business, meaning they will back whoever is in power and whoever they think is likely to win. So if Republicans show signs that they could win general election, I expect a lot more Wall St. dollars to flow to them.

SheaHeyKid said...

Which is why a Bloomberg run for NY gov would be a win-win: it keeps him out of '08 prez race, and potentially unseats Spitzer who is the worst. I honestly think I'd take any of the current Dem candidates for president over Spitzer as a political leader any day.

AddThis

Bookmark and Share

Always sniffing for the truth

Always sniffing for the truth

Blog Archive