Monday, January 05, 2009
When MoveOn's choice for chief election official runs the show,
I guess it's not surprising that a disgusting, farce of a process like this occurs. From the WSJ:
OK, so we're now admitting to counting fake votes. And while we have the power to count them, we don't have the power to NOT count them. Kind of feels like my last diet. I know I'm not hungry for this pizza. I will not eat this piece of pizza. I don't want this... Mmmmmmmmm.
More MoveOn goodness:
I thought the very POINT of a recount was to validate the count. But when a discrepancy between the initial tally and the actual number of ballots materializes--and, most importantly, favors Senator Coleman--we're going to just go with initial tally and forget about the recount. In this county, that is. In other counties, where the recount total favors Franken--we'll probably do it differently.
Here's how the Journal sums up the hijinx:
Funny Business in Minnesota
In which every dubious ruling seems to help Al Franken
Mr. Franken started the recount 215 votes behind Senator Coleman, but he now claims a 225-vote lead and suddenly the man who was insisting on "counting every vote" wants to shut the process down. He's getting help from Mr. Ritchie and his four fellow Canvassing Board members, who have delivered inconsistent rulings and are ignoring glaring problems with the tallies.
Under Minnesota law, election officials are required to make a duplicate ballot if the original is damaged during Election Night counting. Officials are supposed to mark these as "duplicate" and segregate the original ballots. But it appears some officials may have failed to mark ballots as duplicates, which are now being counted in addition to the originals. This helps explain why more than 25 precincts now have more ballots than voters who signed in to vote. By some estimates this double counting has yielded Mr. Franken an additional 80 to 100 votes.
This disenfranchises Minnesotans whose vote counted only once. And one Canvassing Board member, State Supreme Court Justice G. Barry Anderson, has acknowledged that "very likely there was a double counting." Yet the board insists that it lacks the authority to question local officials and it is merely adding the inflated numbers to the totals. [my emphasis]
OK, so we're now admitting to counting fake votes. And while we have the power to count them, we don't have the power to NOT count them. Kind of feels like my last diet. I know I'm not hungry for this pizza. I will not eat this piece of pizza. I don't want this... Mmmmmmmmm.
More MoveOn goodness:
Last month, Mr. Franken's campaign charged that one Hennepin County (Minneapolis) precinct had "lost" 133 votes, since the hand recount showed fewer ballots than machine votes recorded on Election Night. Though there is no proof to this missing vote charge -- officials may have accidentally run the ballots through the machine twice on Election Night -- the Canvassing Board chose to go with the Election Night total, rather than the actual number of ballots in the recount. That decision gave Mr. Franken a gain of 46 votes.
I thought the very POINT of a recount was to validate the count. But when a discrepancy between the initial tally and the actual number of ballots materializes--and, most importantly, favors Senator Coleman--we're going to just go with initial tally and forget about the recount. In this county, that is. In other counties, where the recount total favors Franken--we'll probably do it differently.
And then there are the absentee ballots. The Franken campaign initially howled that some absentee votes had been erroneously rejected by local officials. Counties were supposed to review their absentees and create a list of those they believed were mistakenly rejected. Many Franken-leaning counties did so, submitting 1,350 ballots to include in the results. But many Coleman-leaning counties have yet to complete a re-examination. Despite this lack of uniformity, and though the state Supreme Court has yet to rule on a Coleman request to standardize this absentee review, Mr. Ritchie's office nonetheless plowed through the incomplete pile of 1,350 absentees this weekend, padding Mr. Franken's edge by a further 176 votes.
Here's how the Journal sums up the hijinx:
Minnesotans like to think that their state isn't like New Jersey or Louisiana, and typically it isn't. But we can't recall a similar recount involving optical scanning machines that has changed so many votes, and in which nearly every crucial decision worked to the advantage of the same candidate. The Coleman campaign clearly misjudged the politics here, and the apparent willingness of a partisan like Mr. Ritchie to help his preferred candidate, Mr. Franken. If the Canvassing Board certifies Mr. Franken as the winner based on the current count, it will be anointing a tainted and undeserving Senator.
Labels:
Coleman/Franken
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Always sniffing for the truth
Contributors
Links
- Love and Lunchmeat
- Long Island Prepper
- Fredo's Mets Blog
- Continental Sausage
- Human Events
- Maker's Mark
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Newt Gingrich
- NRO
- Pro Ecclesia
- Ralfy's Whisky Reviews
- Red Albany
- Res Publica et Cetera
- Sour Mash Manifesto
- Straight Bourbon
- Taki Mag
- The American Conservative
- The American Spectator
- The Anchoress Online
- The Politico
- The Weekly Standard
- Wild Turkey Bourbon
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(304)
-
▼
January
(25)
- H-I-larious
- Bailout thoughts
- Lobbyists
- Sadly, I'm Not Surprised
- New Conservative Website
- Obama: Bush 2.0?
- Some more early 2012 scuttlebutt
- Solid Citizenship Award
- Thought This Was Pretty Funny
- Jim Bunning is a Mess
- Transparent?
- Count All The Votes! Count All The Votes!
- Let's Face It: It Was Time For a Change
- Starting off With an Oopsie!
- Clueless
- Obama softening up his intellectual opposition
- The 22-year old virgin
- Return of CASTING CALL!!!
- Boy, Does This Seem Familiar
- While Supplies Last
- Is it just me..
- Obama: Friend or Foe?
- I thought liberals were supposed to be the "open-m...
- You Can't Be Serious
- When MoveOn's choice for chief election official r...
-
▼
January
(25)
0 comments: