Monday, March 26, 2007
Hagel
Wow, Hagel intimating that impeachment of Bush might be an option. Once you've publicly taken that position against someone in your own party, there's no turning back.
Labels:
2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AddThis
Always sniffing for the truth
Contributors
Links
- Love and Lunchmeat
- Long Island Prepper
- Fredo's Mets Blog
- Continental Sausage
- Human Events
- Maker's Mark
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Newt Gingrich
- NRO
- Pro Ecclesia
- Ralfy's Whisky Reviews
- Red Albany
- Res Publica et Cetera
- Sour Mash Manifesto
- Straight Bourbon
- Taki Mag
- The American Conservative
- The American Spectator
- The Anchoress Online
- The Politico
- The Weekly Standard
- Wild Turkey Bourbon
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(477)
-
▼
March
(50)
- Pelosi
- Rudy
- Let the whining begin
- British soldiers
- Thompson
- Candy Mountain
- Hillary...
- Shhhh...
- Hagel
- Iran captures British sailors
- La primera vez es gratis. Y el segundo. Y el terce...
- Troop surge
- More sad news...
- You've got to love going to Drudge and seeing this...
- Edwards Presser
- Liberals
- Egghead Alert
- Noonan
- Queens
- Dean
- Iraq - Civil War?
- Republican Party
- Billary
- Rudy vs. McCain as Terror-fighters
- Chuck Hagel's presser
- Giuliani on public funding of abortion
- A Chink in the Armor?
- Scary predictions that proved accurate
- Hagel's in
- Romney
- Will Dems stand by their own precedents?
- Here's an '08 candidate with natural leadership to...
- National Catholic Register on Rudy
- CPAC
- Death Star: The Aftermath
- Free and fair trade
- Mitt Wins CPAC Straw Poll
- CPAC speeches
- Party insiders
- Mitt ups the ante
- Another day, another small victory in Iraq
- South Carolina Straw Poll
- Obama's ancestors owned slaves
- A Must Read at Ace of Spades
- Sightings at CPAC
- Novak says the Big 3 could still be challenged
- Will the Real Rudy show up at CPAC?
- Gingrich
- Rudy and Judges: His Statements Don't Wash
- Walter Reed
-
▼
March
(50)
1 comments:
I'm truly surprised that the GOP caucus remained unified on the Senate vote, sans Hagel. He's really put himself out there, and IMHO, sacrificed some credibility. I mean, impeachment is way beyond the scope of the current policy disagreements.
High crimes and misdemeanors? B/c the President is willing to exercise a Constitutionally created power--the veto? Doesn't make sense to me. Hagel has some powerful arguments at his disposal, but to sound like a moonbat makes no sense.