Wednesday, September 06, 2006
How the blogosphere left and right respond to 9/11
Michelle Malkin has the story.
These are the kinds of stories that leave you scratching your head and thinking, "how did they get to be such j-holes?"
These are the kinds of stories that leave you scratching your head and thinking, "how did they get to be such j-holes?"
Labels:
GWOT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AddThis
Always sniffing for the truth
Contributors
Links
- Love and Lunchmeat
- Long Island Prepper
- Fredo's Mets Blog
- Continental Sausage
- Human Events
- Maker's Mark
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Newt Gingrich
- NRO
- Pro Ecclesia
- Ralfy's Whisky Reviews
- Red Albany
- Res Publica et Cetera
- Sour Mash Manifesto
- Straight Bourbon
- Taki Mag
- The American Conservative
- The American Spectator
- The Anchoress Online
- The Politico
- The Weekly Standard
- Wild Turkey Bourbon
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(167)
-
▼
September
(26)
- Newt on Terrorism, before it was chic
- Extremely interesting interview with Newt
- Some positive news from Germany
- Olbermann continues his descent
- The Pope Stands Alone
- C-it-go
- Time to place your bets
- Mid-terms
- Hugo Chavez jumps the shark
- More calls for the West to cease its self-destruct...
- The religion of peace
- B & E
- Internet Straw Polls
- (Deflated) Air America
- Saddam
- Bloomberg
- This doesn't taste like victory
- Allen in '08?
- WSJ pours me a bourbon, neat
- NY State of Mind
- How the blogosphere left and right respond to 9/11
- Why Mitt and Rudy are different
- Romney
- Cabinet re-facing
- OK, I admit it.
- Joe Wilson is the definition of unpatriotic
-
▼
September
(26)
7 comments:
As usual, typical dummycrat "let's not think this through" mentality. The irony here is that by doing what they plan, it will simply drum up even more eyeballs and viewers for ABC's series, countering their own goal.
An even more interesting question is how a movie that the left claims to be so unflattering to them even made it onto ABC's lineup. (Not that the movie does the right any favors, apparently it blasts Bush's first 9 months.) But still, I wonder if ABC will buckle under the pressure (see NYPost cover story today, for example)
Typical. The same people who showered Fahrenheit 9/11 with awards as a documentary are criticizing a miniseries labeled as a dramatization because it makes their precious Bubba look bad.
These j-holes will talk about free speech with a tear in their eye one minute, then turn around and plan to effectively censor information about this movie the next.
The posts on DU have made me physically ill. I must go vomit now.
ABC will buckle. Count on it.
The buckling has already begun:
ABC left open the possibility that the scenes that have been criticized could still be removed from the miniseries, which will be subject to edit before air.
"No one has seen the final version of the film because the editing process is not yet complete, so criticisms of film specifics are premature and irresponsible," ABC said.
Sources said ABC already has made minor edits to the miniseries, toning down one particular scene involving Berger that was interpreted by some as suggesting he at one point opted to not order the assassination of Osama bin Laden.
Wrong was I. Ran it did they. Now...matters are better.
I actually watched "Path to 9-11" in its entirety, both nights. Very, very well done. I also heard one of the 9-11 commission members stating he thought the mini-series was very accurate to the 9-11 report, regardless of the Clintonista's protests.