Wednesday, September 13, 2006
This doesn't taste like victory
By what framework can we possibly interpret Sen. Chafee's primary victory as a win for the Republican party? Going back to one of my earlier posts (Party of Two...), the answer is: in no way is this a win for conservatives, unless we care only about the Republican party itself (and even then in name only), and not the principles.
Great, so Chafee's win gives "Republicans" a chance to hold onto the Senate. But so what? Honestly, is a Chafee vote any different than a Democrat vote? Doubtful. Chafee has not only voted against every conservative principle (tax cuts, abortion, John Bolton, etc.), he even voted against Bush in 2004!
That the Republican national committee put in extra effort to guarantee Chafee's victory is exactly why I made my earlier post. The Republican party seemingly cares less about actually standing for the conservative principles on which it was founded, and more about just staying in power for themselves. Let's be honest: the Republicans are no more or less likely to get ANY of the legislation we true conservatives care about passed by having Chafee in that seat rather than a Democrat. Better to have stood for principles and supported Laffey.
Great, so Chafee's win gives "Republicans" a chance to hold onto the Senate. But so what? Honestly, is a Chafee vote any different than a Democrat vote? Doubtful. Chafee has not only voted against every conservative principle (tax cuts, abortion, John Bolton, etc.), he even voted against Bush in 2004!
That the Republican national committee put in extra effort to guarantee Chafee's victory is exactly why I made my earlier post. The Republican party seemingly cares less about actually standing for the conservative principles on which it was founded, and more about just staying in power for themselves. Let's be honest: the Republicans are no more or less likely to get ANY of the legislation we true conservatives care about passed by having Chafee in that seat rather than a Democrat. Better to have stood for principles and supported Laffey.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Always sniffing for the truth
Contributors
Links
- Love and Lunchmeat
- Long Island Prepper
- Fredo's Mets Blog
- Continental Sausage
- Human Events
- Maker's Mark
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Newt Gingrich
- NRO
- Pro Ecclesia
- Ralfy's Whisky Reviews
- Red Albany
- Res Publica et Cetera
- Sour Mash Manifesto
- Straight Bourbon
- Taki Mag
- The American Conservative
- The American Spectator
- The Anchoress Online
- The Politico
- The Weekly Standard
- Wild Turkey Bourbon
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(167)
-
▼
September
(26)
- Newt on Terrorism, before it was chic
- Extremely interesting interview with Newt
- Some positive news from Germany
- Olbermann continues his descent
- The Pope Stands Alone
- C-it-go
- Time to place your bets
- Mid-terms
- Hugo Chavez jumps the shark
- More calls for the West to cease its self-destruct...
- The religion of peace
- B & E
- Internet Straw Polls
- (Deflated) Air America
- Saddam
- Bloomberg
- This doesn't taste like victory
- Allen in '08?
- WSJ pours me a bourbon, neat
- NY State of Mind
- How the blogosphere left and right respond to 9/11
- Why Mitt and Rudy are different
- Romney
- Cabinet re-facing
- OK, I admit it.
- Joe Wilson is the definition of unpatriotic
-
▼
September
(26)
2 comments:
Another reason for me to register as a Republican so I can vote in the primaries. Hopefully this nonsense won't arise in NY, but I want a vote if it does.
Also - Bolton is awesome.
Anyone who sticks it to the UN on a daily basis is awesome!