Thursday, January 25, 2007
Brownback's stance
If these assertions are true, it means that Brownback wasn't always pro-life (or at least as adamant about it as he'd currently like you to believe). If so, it completely negates his major knock against Romney, and should only fuel those who are currently on the fence to join the Romney camp.
Labels:
2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AddThis
Always sniffing for the truth
Contributors
Links
- Love and Lunchmeat
- Long Island Prepper
- Fredo's Mets Blog
- Continental Sausage
- Human Events
- Maker's Mark
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Newt Gingrich
- NRO
- Pro Ecclesia
- Ralfy's Whisky Reviews
- Red Albany
- Res Publica et Cetera
- Sour Mash Manifesto
- Straight Bourbon
- Taki Mag
- The American Conservative
- The American Spectator
- The Anchoress Online
- The Politico
- The Weekly Standard
- Wild Turkey Bourbon
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(477)
-
▼
January
(46)
- Rudy: I want to love him
- Eagle lugging a deer head causes outage
- True colors
- Carter
- Billary
- When Greenies and Dems collide
- Deep thoughts from C.S. Lewis
- Mitt Statement on the March for Life
- Wachowski Brothers present: AMSOL
- Carter: Too many Jews on Holocaust Memorial Council
- Brownback responds
- Brownback's stance
- Ru-dy Ru-dy
- If you've ever watched Star Wars,
- Romney updates
- I thought it was Clemenza,
- Stale, male and pale
- The Democratic Response
- Fumare bloggers go off the deep end
- Poll-skewing shenanigans
- Congress
- Underdogs to the fore?
- Keating says nay
- In his own words
- GOP Blogger straw poll results
- Senator Swimtrunks
- Duncan Hunter wins straw poll in McCain's home state
- Putting the "op" back in op-ed
- The BloGlo Hates Romney (surprise, surprise)
- Better late than never
- Tancredo jumps in
- Mitt
- New GOP Blogger Straw Poll
- Can't we all just get along?
- David Frum makes the case for Mitt
- Stem cells, part deux
- Iraq Troop Levels
- They've got him surrounded
- Wanna know what Congress really cares about?
- MSM
- CNN
- More of Romney on the brink
- WaPo Delenda Est
- '08 Candidates - Where We Stand
- Times Shenanigans
- Cent'anni!
-
▼
January
(46)
1 comments:
One would think that Brownback supporters would realize that someone can convert to the pro-life movement, and that doesn't make them any less believable or less of an effective advocate than those who've always been pro-life. After all, the same was true of Reagan and, as you have mentioned, Sam himself.
That said, Brownback has earned his bona fides with years of consistent, visible service for the prolife agenda in the U.S. Senate.
Brownback supporters can say, "our guy has done more for the pro-life movement than your guy." But they can't say, "your guy has changed his position and our guy hasn't."
And most importantly, this election isn't about who has done more for the pro-life agenda in the past, it's about who will be able to do more to further the goals of life (as a GOP presidential candidate) in the future.