Wednesday, January 24, 2007
The Democratic Response
Sen. Webb made a stunning entry on the national scene with his response to the SOTU tonight. He looked comfortable, was in command of his delivery, and had a sharp focus that the SOTU (partly b/c of the nature of the speech) lacked. He zeroed in on two issues: class disparity and Iraq. Sen. Webb's grievances about Iraq have been well documented. The members of this blog have spilled many pixels discussing the relative merits of the Bush doctrine and a Mideast policy grounded in realism. I'll pass on re-hashing that discussion here.
But on the issue of economic populism, Webb hit a home run. He discussed the disparity in perception of the economy: Wall Street types trumpeting all-time highs on the Dow and Goldilocks GDP numbers; while main street America confronts spiraling health care and education costs, and the loss of manufacturing and other blue collar employment to foreign workers. These are real issues confronting the majority of American votes, and I haven't heard them addressed in a systematic way by any GOP candidate save Duncan Hunter. Given that it's unlikely Mr. Hunter is winning the nomination, the GOP is likely to have a candidate whose answer to lopsided trade policy is to simply ignore it and cling to free-trade rhetoric. The GOP response to spiraling health care costs will probably be more consumer choice and a reduction in the reliance on 3rd party payers. I don't think most Americans will be comfortable with these solutions (while the importance of HSA's and market reform w/r/t health care is, to me, a compelling argument).
I really hope that the prospective GOP candidates pay close attention to Sen. Webb's speech. Regardless of who takes the Dem nomination, they'll be hammering Iraq and populist economic themes in 2008. If Iraq is not a winning proposition by that time, and the GOP does not have a popular plan to protect middle class job security and purchasing power, I have a sneaking suspicion we're going to get stung. While it might not have received Milton Friedman's imprimatur, economic populism may be the only thing that can save the White House for Republicans in 2008.
But on the issue of economic populism, Webb hit a home run. He discussed the disparity in perception of the economy: Wall Street types trumpeting all-time highs on the Dow and Goldilocks GDP numbers; while main street America confronts spiraling health care and education costs, and the loss of manufacturing and other blue collar employment to foreign workers. These are real issues confronting the majority of American votes, and I haven't heard them addressed in a systematic way by any GOP candidate save Duncan Hunter. Given that it's unlikely Mr. Hunter is winning the nomination, the GOP is likely to have a candidate whose answer to lopsided trade policy is to simply ignore it and cling to free-trade rhetoric. The GOP response to spiraling health care costs will probably be more consumer choice and a reduction in the reliance on 3rd party payers. I don't think most Americans will be comfortable with these solutions (while the importance of HSA's and market reform w/r/t health care is, to me, a compelling argument).
I really hope that the prospective GOP candidates pay close attention to Sen. Webb's speech. Regardless of who takes the Dem nomination, they'll be hammering Iraq and populist economic themes in 2008. If Iraq is not a winning proposition by that time, and the GOP does not have a popular plan to protect middle class job security and purchasing power, I have a sneaking suspicion we're going to get stung. While it might not have received Milton Friedman's imprimatur, economic populism may be the only thing that can save the White House for Republicans in 2008.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Always sniffing for the truth
Contributors
Links
- Love and Lunchmeat
- Long Island Prepper
- Fredo's Mets Blog
- Continental Sausage
- Human Events
- Maker's Mark
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Newt Gingrich
- NRO
- Pro Ecclesia
- Ralfy's Whisky Reviews
- Red Albany
- Res Publica et Cetera
- Sour Mash Manifesto
- Straight Bourbon
- Taki Mag
- The American Conservative
- The American Spectator
- The Anchoress Online
- The Politico
- The Weekly Standard
- Wild Turkey Bourbon
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(477)
-
▼
January
(46)
- Rudy: I want to love him
- Eagle lugging a deer head causes outage
- True colors
- Carter
- Billary
- When Greenies and Dems collide
- Deep thoughts from C.S. Lewis
- Mitt Statement on the March for Life
- Wachowski Brothers present: AMSOL
- Carter: Too many Jews on Holocaust Memorial Council
- Brownback responds
- Brownback's stance
- Ru-dy Ru-dy
- If you've ever watched Star Wars,
- Romney updates
- I thought it was Clemenza,
- Stale, male and pale
- The Democratic Response
- Fumare bloggers go off the deep end
- Poll-skewing shenanigans
- Congress
- Underdogs to the fore?
- Keating says nay
- In his own words
- GOP Blogger straw poll results
- Senator Swimtrunks
- Duncan Hunter wins straw poll in McCain's home state
- Putting the "op" back in op-ed
- The BloGlo Hates Romney (surprise, surprise)
- Better late than never
- Tancredo jumps in
- Mitt
- New GOP Blogger Straw Poll
- Can't we all just get along?
- David Frum makes the case for Mitt
- Stem cells, part deux
- Iraq Troop Levels
- They've got him surrounded
- Wanna know what Congress really cares about?
- MSM
- CNN
- More of Romney on the brink
- WaPo Delenda Est
- '08 Candidates - Where We Stand
- Times Shenanigans
- Cent'anni!
-
▼
January
(46)
1 comments:
Well stated Fredo, I believe the Republicans must be ahead of the curve in identifying and framing the issues that matter most to win in '08. Here again I have faith in Mitt for the following reasons.
1. I believe he has the ability to survey the complex issues landscape and get a good sense of what the top three are; know where he stands on each of these issues; and clearly articulate a plan that allows him to frame the issue (i.e., put Repubs on offensive with first strike rather than defensive).
2. I believe actions speak louder than words, and his past successes tell me he will propose legislation that actually accomplishes something, as opposed to usual empty political rhetoric that does very little.
3. Given his religious convictions, as well as financial independence, he doesn't have to be beholden to anyone. This will allow him to freely propose legislation that he believes is truly in broad interest of America, as opposed to pandering to each special interest group to curry favor for some future payback.
But, all this is just hypothesis and the debates leading up to primary will give a better indication.