Tuesday, October 16, 2007
A spot on analysis of where Mitt stands
From the AmSpecBlog:
Rudy has gotten some separation from Mitt (and the whole field) by appearing the most unflappable/in-command at the debates, as evidenced most clearly by his retort to Mitt when he was challenged on the line-item veto. Not only did he appear unfazed by the attack, but got in a good counterpunch in terms of substance. He calmly pointed out that the line-item veto as constituted then was unconsititutional, reached out to SoCons in the process (he got in the catch phrase "strict constructionist"), and scored points with the pragmatist (by pointing out he beat Billary in the process).
Jennifer's right: Mitt's assets are still formidable. I want to see that he can punch and counterpunch on his feet. Right now Rudy and McCain have been the best with that aspect of the debates.
When It Rains It Pours - Monday, October 15, 2007 @ 7:58:06 PM
Others have noted the rough patch for Romney --"in the ditch" Richelieu posits. It is easy to string two bad debates, a couple gaffes and a few less than stellar polls and wind up in trouble in this race. The test of a candidate is whether he can pull it together when things begin to go off the rails. He has assets, not just the bank account, which others don't such as business skill, a presidential "look" and a very fine political organization. But is he great on his feet and believable as a commander in chief? If anyone needed an "I paid for this microphone" moment it is he.
Posted By: Jennifer Rubin
Rudy has gotten some separation from Mitt (and the whole field) by appearing the most unflappable/in-command at the debates, as evidenced most clearly by his retort to Mitt when he was challenged on the line-item veto. Not only did he appear unfazed by the attack, but got in a good counterpunch in terms of substance. He calmly pointed out that the line-item veto as constituted then was unconsititutional, reached out to SoCons in the process (he got in the catch phrase "strict constructionist"), and scored points with the pragmatist (by pointing out he beat Billary in the process).
Jennifer's right: Mitt's assets are still formidable. I want to see that he can punch and counterpunch on his feet. Right now Rudy and McCain have been the best with that aspect of the debates.
Labels:
2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AddThis
Always sniffing for the truth
Contributors
Links
- Love and Lunchmeat
- Long Island Prepper
- Fredo's Mets Blog
- Continental Sausage
- Human Events
- Maker's Mark
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Newt Gingrich
- NRO
- Pro Ecclesia
- Ralfy's Whisky Reviews
- Red Albany
- Res Publica et Cetera
- Sour Mash Manifesto
- Straight Bourbon
- Taki Mag
- The American Conservative
- The American Spectator
- The Anchoress Online
- The Politico
- The Weekly Standard
- Wild Turkey Bourbon
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(477)
-
▼
October
(59)
- Solid Citizenship Award
- Hillary
- Giuliani's aide de camp loses her mind
- A pre-Halloween scare for Fredo
- All Bogged Down and Nowhere to Go
- Wow! They Got Something Right!
- Congratulations Judge Southwick
- Ponnuru on McCain
- The Surge continues to produce positive results
- Fred's NH campaign manager goes turncoat,
- Rating the candidates
- The Huckabee Train Starts a-Rolling
- In a decision that the VA GOP will likely regret,
- Hey, DC, you paying attention?
- McCain vs. Clinton
- Where I stand in Decision '08
- Update Your Votes
- Jindal wins LA-Gov
- A few great conservative quotes
- End of an Error
- The Clinton Machine
- The Ills of the Country - Now on the Web!!!
- Life is beautiful
- Berger-Libby Hypocrisy
- Brownback dropping out?
- That's why they play the game
- Turkish Military Action
- This is not helpful
- This came from email
- John Paul the Great
- A spot on analysis of where Mitt stands
- If this were the private sector...
- Huckabee's Horton?
- Sia - Breath Me
- ManBearPig
- Today's word of the day
- Quiz Time
- Gore on the move?
- Sell-a-bray-shun Time, come on!
- Defending Mitt
- Fred Thompson Debate - Hem, Haw, and Ummm
- Debate wrap
- Ranking the field
- Hillary!-O!bama
- I grow weary of the spin
- The Times must be joking
- Somebody annoint Peggy Queen
- First there were clouds in the distance...
- Obama: Flag pins are for phony patriots
- Scalia- by any means necessary
- It's nice to see not everything's upside down
- Shocked again! This time it's frightening.
- Fred continues to underwhelm
- A landmark poll on free trade
- How'd a nitwit like you get so tasteful?
- Iran
- Read it. Carefully. Every single word.
- It's so rare to be surprised by a film
- Counting the days
-
▼
October
(59)
2 comments:
I think Rudy, McCain to some extent, and Newt (if he were running) would all hold an edge over Mitt in debates right now, b/c they are very clear and firm in their policy beliefs. This gives them an edge in debating b/c they can come right out forcefully with their position. I think mitt is still formulating his policies in certain areas, and as a result it doesn't come across as forcefully. But I'm sure that he will sharpen his position over time and - once combined with his charismatic speaking style - that should give him at least the ability to hold his own against Rudy to neutralize any advantage there.
I think that while Mitt has a very polished delivery, Rudy is an excellent speaker in that he is very comfortable, relaxed, personable, and capable of really selling his message. He is perhaps the most persuasive of all the candidates.