Monday, September 08, 2008
Want to see some actual reporting?
The WaPo is apparently consolidating its hold as the MSM's "newspaper of record", supplanting the NY Times by doing what the Times used to do: a center-left editorial page, coupled with actual hard news.
Check out this story, a "fact-check" of sorts, on Palin's claim to have gotten the ball rolling towards a major new natural gas pipeline.
The story makes a few main points:
1) Points out how Palin took on the BP, Conoco and ExxonMobil when they were trying to cut a sweetheart deal under Gov. Murkowski and with the support of VP Cheney and Sen Stevens.
2) By dictating terms to the industry, and then opening the door to any firm willing to meet their terms, Alaska was able to get an agreement in place that was more favorable than the preliminary agreement Murkowski had struck with the three original firms.
3) Points out how there are still many hurdles for this plan to payoff--much wrangling over getting the pipeline in place, and then forging an agreement for the three petrol companies to ship their gas through another firm's pipeline. Everything that's been accomplished so far is prelude.
What makes this news and different from, say, network TV news or the Times, is where the Post ends the article. I was pretty sure the typical MSM article would have ended here:
The Post's editors wisely realized that the real story in this case is not was hasn't yet been accomplished, but how much has. So they end it here:
Check out this story, a "fact-check" of sorts, on Palin's claim to have gotten the ball rolling towards a major new natural gas pipeline.
The story makes a few main points:
1) Points out how Palin took on the BP, Conoco and ExxonMobil when they were trying to cut a sweetheart deal under Gov. Murkowski and with the support of VP Cheney and Sen Stevens.
2) By dictating terms to the industry, and then opening the door to any firm willing to meet their terms, Alaska was able to get an agreement in place that was more favorable than the preliminary agreement Murkowski had struck with the three original firms.
3) Points out how there are still many hurdles for this plan to payoff--much wrangling over getting the pipeline in place, and then forging an agreement for the three petrol companies to ship their gas through another firm's pipeline. Everything that's been accomplished so far is prelude.
What makes this news and different from, say, network TV news or the Times, is where the Post ends the article. I was pretty sure the typical MSM article would have ended here:
BP and Conoco Phillips have announced plans to build a pipeline of their own without the state's backing -- a sign that the political and economic wrangling over this immense and risky project is far from over.
The Post's editors wisely realized that the real story in this case is not was hasn't yet been accomplished, but how much has. So they end it here:
But it is also a sign that Ms. Palin's outflanking of the oil companies injected some competition and urgency into a process that was previously stalled. Perhaps her Democratic opponent for the governorship in 2006, who campaigned on similar ideas, would have achieved these results. Nevertheless, Ms. Palin actually did.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Always sniffing for the truth
Contributors
Links
- Love and Lunchmeat
- Long Island Prepper
- Fredo's Mets Blog
- Continental Sausage
- Human Events
- Maker's Mark
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Newt Gingrich
- NRO
- Pro Ecclesia
- Ralfy's Whisky Reviews
- Red Albany
- Res Publica et Cetera
- Sour Mash Manifesto
- Straight Bourbon
- Taki Mag
- The American Conservative
- The American Spectator
- The Anchoress Online
- The Politico
- The Weekly Standard
- Wild Turkey Bourbon
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(731)
-
▼
September
(48)
- Talk about a solid ad...
- Not good
- Dude, where's my bailout?
- McCain delay
- Biden: Gaffe machine in operation. Please stand c...
- WaPo on the 269-269 ticking time bomb
- From Bloomberg.com: How the Dems caused the financ...
- While McCain's done a great job as our candidate,
- Culinary Paradise
- Makes you stop and think
- Nothing to do but laugh
- Feeding frenzy
- More good news
- Lipstick on a pig
- Gerson on Trig Palin and eugenic abortion
- I go back and forth.
- Belated Line Change
- test
- Serves him right
- A little philosophy for you
- CNN: Still towing the party line
- Fantastic new McCain ad: Original Mavericks
- Want to see some actual reporting?
- Ding dong, the witch(es) are dead
- Mad Money 3: Deadline Update
- Palin / NYT
- Barack Obama: "My Muslim Faith"
- Rasmussen Daily Tracking Poll: All tied up
- I'm a "Fox-Only" kid now, at least till the electi...
- In Contrast to the Boston Herald's Report,
- Where's Christopher Walken when you need him...
- Very, very, very good sign
- McCain
- Andrew McCarthy on McCain/Palin
- Predictable
- ICYMI: Hurricane Sarah Makes Landfall
- I warned you about the WaPo
- Best. Speeches. Ever.
- The Day Hope Returned
- I'll sleep well tonight.
- Rudy was killer. Sarah is too.
- Quit screwing around, it's crunch time
- Newt brings the pain
- RNC
- Campaign in the balance
- Fredo's Mad Money Challenge, Part 3: The Final Cou...
- Veepstakes: The final tally
- Will it matter?
-
▼
September
(48)
2 comments:
I definitely have seen some positive signs from WaPo over the past several months indicating they may be moving towards a more useful unbiased media source. We'll see how it plays out in late Oct if McCain/Palin are still holding a lead.
Like I said, I can handle them being a liberal paper. Most of the major metro papers are.
Just give me some separation between your front page and your editorial section.
This article was some evidence that they are trying to do just that.