Tuesday, June 05, 2012
An Economic Argument for the Traditional Family
In an op-ed piece from, of all places, the LA Times, Kay Hymowitz makes a stats-based economic case for getting married before having kids. Much of it is due to self-selection - unskilled, low-earning women are more likely to be single mothers in the first place, but her citation of a Ron Haskins of the Pew Center is very telling:
"If young people do three things — graduate from high school, get a job and get married and wait until they're 21 before having a baby — they have an almost 75% chance of making it into the middle class."
There's a reason the traditional family came to be - it was evolutionarily advantageous despite males' biological imperative to reproduce with as many females as possible.
"If young people do three things — graduate from high school, get a job and get married and wait until they're 21 before having a baby — they have an almost 75% chance of making it into the middle class."
There's a reason the traditional family came to be - it was evolutionarily advantageous despite males' biological imperative to reproduce with as many females as possible.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Always sniffing for the truth
Contributors
Links
- Love and Lunchmeat
- Long Island Prepper
- Fredo's Mets Blog
- Continental Sausage
- Human Events
- Maker's Mark
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Newt Gingrich
- NRO
- Pro Ecclesia
- Ralfy's Whisky Reviews
- Red Albany
- Res Publica et Cetera
- Sour Mash Manifesto
- Straight Bourbon
- Taki Mag
- The American Conservative
- The American Spectator
- The Anchoress Online
- The Politico
- The Weekly Standard
- Wild Turkey Bourbon
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(232)
-
▼
June
(37)
- Ed Burns explains ideological drift
- Mitt tries to make hay with Court's declaration th...
- Roberts has "gone native," liberal accolades are e...
- Holder in Contempt of Congress
- The Senate Race is the New Front Line
- OccObs awarded!
- The dissent holds the key
- Krauthamer on Roberts
- Chief Justice Souter
- SCOTUSblog breaks down the PPACA decision
- Fortuno gets some love from NR
- Stewart rips on everyone w/r/t Executive Privelege...
- Nancy Pelosi... she's pretty cool...
- A Physician Explains the Problem with Obamacare
- Nixama
- Pawlenty rumors gain traction
- The Longest Wait
- Romney-Pawlenty '12?
- You grab my junk...
- I'm glad I'm not Ronan Farrow
- The Veep is full of #win
- A helpful chart
- National Bourbon Day
- Kindegarten Graduation... Palestine Style
- The Daily Show on WI recall
- Why do unions do all the intimidating?
- That's the power of bacon
- This is a product that needed to be made
- Gentlemen
- My Jeb mancrush compels me to link this
- I grow weary of labor unions
- An Economic Argument for the Traditional Family
- DOJ to monitor WI recall election
- A great explanation of why the Fed is f*cking you
- More Veepstakes rumors
- The man who should have been President
- Blogger bash!
-
▼
June
(37)
4 comments:
despite males' biological imperative to reproduce with as many females as possible.
Huh?
Didn't you ever watch any nature shows? Drr, brr and grrillas all fight for the right to mate. The dominant manbeast propagates his genes. We're animals too, with only intellect keeping us from grunting on the office desk with the secretary all the time.
I'm supposed to like girls?
Joking aside, these facts were an oft-repeated part of Santorum's stump speech. I guess it's OK for the LAT to print now that Rick's dropped out.
What's also interesting is that this would, in some quarters, be considered "controversial," or even "hate speech."