Wednesday, February 07, 2007

James Sherley

Don't know the name? Well, read on and learn - this is probably the only time you'll find me on the same side of an issue as Noam Chomsky. Sherley is a bio engineering prof at MIT who started a starvation campaign two days ago outside the MIT president's office to protest his denial of tenure. He claims that the denial was based on racism, and ever since coming to MIT in '98 he claims he's been discriminated against.

The more likely reason that he was denied tenure is that his research focuses exclusively on adult stem cells; as a Christian he refuses to work with embryonic stem cells and challenges his colleagues to prove why one person's life is more valuable than another. I believe he knows this is why he was denied tenure, and is intelligently using the racist card here. That is to say, the liberal MSM would never support a professor who was scorned b/c he opposed use of embryonic stem cells, but watch how they'll flock to the story of someone denied a job b/c of racism. Smart play..

Now, maybe MIT is right, that at the end of the day his accomplishments just fell short of what they require for tenure. On the other hand, the last time I checked, people who have a bachelor's from Harvard, an M.D. and Ph.D. from Johns Hopkins, and are awarded a $2.5 M grant from prestigious NIH generally don't "fall short."

3 comments:

Fredo said...

Very interesting. Thanks for the inside scoop, SHK. I had heard of Mr. Sherley and his hunger strike on the Dr. of Democracy radio program on the Excellence In Broadcasting network. But your tidbit on the NIH grant and his impressive credentials I had not heard. Is there any way to compare Mr. Sherley to others who have had their tenure applications accepted?

SheaHeyKid said...

I'd say his background is as impressive as any on MIT faculty. Whether his research at MIT has been sufficient to warrant tenure I can't say, not my field. Although MIT says it had 3 independent reviews of his tenure application all deem that MIT acted appropriately, I doubt they will release a list of reasons for his rejection that we can evaluate, so unfortunately we are left to idle speculation. But the fact that he got the NIH grant in the past year or two, and they in effect act as a review body, tells me he must have had some interesting and promising work.

Anonymous said...

Good for people to know.

AddThis

Bookmark and Share

Always sniffing for the truth

Always sniffing for the truth

Blog Archive