Monday, February 04, 2008
Final thoughts on Mega-Huge-Super-Duper Tuesday
CA: Mitt and McCain. One will win by a few points. The other will lose by a few points. In terms of delegates, it doesn't matter that much, as CA isn't WTA. Mitt needs the state though for bragging rights, so that the Northeast results don't make McCain look inevitable.
NY/CT/NJ: McCain's got every single delegate (183) from all three states in his pocket, like so many nickles and dimes. And he won't even share.
MA: Mitt should win, and better win convincingly.
The South: AL/TN/GA all seem to be three-way tossups. It'll be interesting to see if Huck's support fades like it has elsewhere, as Rush beats the "a vote for Huck is a vote for McCain" drum. My guess is that Huck's support does not fade, thanks to all those Southerners still fighting the War Between the States. As a result, I'm guessing Huck comes near his polling numbers. Meaning I have know idea who wins these states because they're polling as tossups. Aren't you paying attention? I already told you that.
MO: The only WTA state that seems pretty close. Unlike in CA, a couple of points in either direction here could yield 58 delegates, and 116 delegate swing. Along w/ CA, the most watched for result of the night. And much more meaningful, in terms of delegates.
CO & UT: Mitt leads big.
AZ: Massachusetts in reverse.
AK/WV/etc.: DK/DC. Just give me the delegate count.
NY/CT/NJ: McCain's got every single delegate (183) from all three states in his pocket, like so many nickles and dimes. And he won't even share.
MA: Mitt should win, and better win convincingly.
The South: AL/TN/GA all seem to be three-way tossups. It'll be interesting to see if Huck's support fades like it has elsewhere, as Rush beats the "a vote for Huck is a vote for McCain" drum. My guess is that Huck's support does not fade, thanks to all those Southerners still fighting the War Between the States. As a result, I'm guessing Huck comes near his polling numbers. Meaning I have know idea who wins these states because they're polling as tossups. Aren't you paying attention? I already told you that.
MO: The only WTA state that seems pretty close. Unlike in CA, a couple of points in either direction here could yield 58 delegates, and 116 delegate swing. Along w/ CA, the most watched for result of the night. And much more meaningful, in terms of delegates.
CO & UT: Mitt leads big.
AZ: Massachusetts in reverse.
AK/WV/etc.: DK/DC. Just give me the delegate count.
Labels:
2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Always sniffing for the truth
Contributors
Links
- Love and Lunchmeat
- Long Island Prepper
- Fredo's Mets Blog
- Continental Sausage
- Human Events
- Maker's Mark
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Newt Gingrich
- NRO
- Pro Ecclesia
- Ralfy's Whisky Reviews
- Red Albany
- Res Publica et Cetera
- Sour Mash Manifesto
- Straight Bourbon
- Taki Mag
- The American Conservative
- The American Spectator
- The Anchoress Online
- The Politico
- The Weekly Standard
- Wild Turkey Bourbon
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(731)
-
▼
February
(84)
- Just Another Hollywood Bimbo, Only Dumber
- The troop surge in Iraq is working
- Some insightful anthropology
- Obama's rhetoric is a strength.
- Check out the new Obama pic in the sidebar
- Gamecock stuffs his PC-police dossier ...
- Buckley on Iraq
- Not another dime to the MSM.
- A note to contributors
- Mason-Dixon FL poll
- This is an O!bamanation
- Obama-McCain
- Veep Watch #7: Mark Sanford
- Veep Watch #6: Charlie Crist
- Veep Watch #5: Fred D. Thompson
- Good news/bad news
- I can add little but my profound gratitude
- Obama! for a strong defense
- McCain VP
- Veep Watch #4: Tim Pawlenty
- Yes He Can
- Veep Watch #3: Rudy Giuliani
- McCain v. Obama
- Veep Watch #2: Tom Ridge
- The Lion of Good Government
- A bit of advertising from pg 1 of today's Journal:
- The Rage is Indescribable
- Anthropogenic global warming is real.
- Ironic
- This ship is sinking fast The Ship Be Sinking
- If Ralph Nader falls in a forest, does he make a n...
- Huckabee gets the final word in
- Barack Obama
- Hackabee
- Amen, Brother
- Obama on Cuba
- Say Hello to...
- Rise of the Obamatons
- Ice, Ice, (O)Baby
- A little more background on the Times flap
- And the beat marches on...
- Coining a new term
- Michelle Obama
- McCain v Obama: current polls
- Veep Watch: Condi?
- The coming chaos: Dem convention edition
- Fredo's Mad Money Challenge - Final Results
- Happy Birthday, D.C.
- It's already starting
- McCain throws down the gauntlet
- A Churchillian Republican
- "Super" Bowl?
- Romney endorsement?
- Time of death - call it
- Just to Make Sure We're All on the Same Page
- "Straight Talk"?
- Gearing up
- 2044
- 2012
- Obama supporters: creative little buggers
- Senator McCain's Post-Potomac Primary Presser
- The end of the beginning and a question for our co...
- Antonin
- Paul "refocused" on Congressional primary, still i...
- Obama time?
- Delegates
- Huck wins LA, KS. WA too close to call. Paul say...
- GOP candidates on judicial appointments
- Dem plan of attack against McCain
- Tampa Bay: The Midway Island of 2008
- McCain at CPAC
- Mittmentum..
- Super Tuesday
- Liveblogging Tsunami Tuesday
- Watch the results roll in
- What does it all mean?
- Final thoughts on Mega-Huge-Super-Duper Tuesday
- This made me laugh,
- They keep lining up...
- Thank you, Bill Kristol
- WOW
- Catholics for McCain
- Olson, Estrada back McCain
- Dem numbers
-
▼
February
(84)
2 comments:
BTW, while I'm pretty sure who I'm voting for tomorrow, this race is the first time I can honestly say I might change my mind the night before the election. In no other Presidential primary have I not known who I was voting for months in advance of the voting.
I think Mitt will win MA convincingly, he has a big, steady lead there and the top talk radio guy is an enormous Mitt supporter.