Tuesday, February 19, 2008
McCain v Obama: current polls
MattC over at Race 4 '08 has plotted recent head-to-head polling, and the electoral map currently looks as follows:
This represents a 34 EV shift from the 2004 map in favor of the Democrats so far, making the presumed totals Obama-286; McCain-252.
The results against Billary are much more encouraging, but that doesn't seem very pertinent currently. MattC left a comment on his own thread to drive the point home:
This represents a 34 EV shift from the 2004 map in favor of the Democrats so far, making the presumed totals Obama-286; McCain-252.
The results against Billary are much more encouraging, but that doesn't seem very pertinent currently. MattC left a comment on his own thread to drive the point home:
...it shows 4 red states flipping blue so far and no blue states flipping red. These are just the states we have polling data for thus far. I would guess there’s a lot more blue to red with an Obama candidacy than red to blue, and further polls will bear that out — at this stage in the game.
Labels:
2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Always sniffing for the truth
Contributors
Links
- Love and Lunchmeat
- Long Island Prepper
- Fredo's Mets Blog
- Continental Sausage
- Human Events
- Maker's Mark
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Newt Gingrich
- NRO
- Pro Ecclesia
- Ralfy's Whisky Reviews
- Red Albany
- Res Publica et Cetera
- Sour Mash Manifesto
- Straight Bourbon
- Taki Mag
- The American Conservative
- The American Spectator
- The Anchoress Online
- The Politico
- The Weekly Standard
- Wild Turkey Bourbon
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(731)
-
▼
February
(84)
- Just Another Hollywood Bimbo, Only Dumber
- The troop surge in Iraq is working
- Some insightful anthropology
- Obama's rhetoric is a strength.
- Check out the new Obama pic in the sidebar
- Gamecock stuffs his PC-police dossier ...
- Buckley on Iraq
- Not another dime to the MSM.
- A note to contributors
- Mason-Dixon FL poll
- This is an O!bamanation
- Obama-McCain
- Veep Watch #7: Mark Sanford
- Veep Watch #6: Charlie Crist
- Veep Watch #5: Fred D. Thompson
- Good news/bad news
- I can add little but my profound gratitude
- Obama! for a strong defense
- McCain VP
- Veep Watch #4: Tim Pawlenty
- Yes He Can
- Veep Watch #3: Rudy Giuliani
- McCain v. Obama
- Veep Watch #2: Tom Ridge
- The Lion of Good Government
- A bit of advertising from pg 1 of today's Journal:
- The Rage is Indescribable
- Anthropogenic global warming is real.
- Ironic
- This ship is sinking fast The Ship Be Sinking
- If Ralph Nader falls in a forest, does he make a n...
- Huckabee gets the final word in
- Barack Obama
- Hackabee
- Amen, Brother
- Obama on Cuba
- Say Hello to...
- Rise of the Obamatons
- Ice, Ice, (O)Baby
- A little more background on the Times flap
- And the beat marches on...
- Coining a new term
- Michelle Obama
- McCain v Obama: current polls
- Veep Watch: Condi?
- The coming chaos: Dem convention edition
- Fredo's Mad Money Challenge - Final Results
- Happy Birthday, D.C.
- It's already starting
- McCain throws down the gauntlet
- A Churchillian Republican
- "Super" Bowl?
- Romney endorsement?
- Time of death - call it
- Just to Make Sure We're All on the Same Page
- "Straight Talk"?
- Gearing up
- 2044
- 2012
- Obama supporters: creative little buggers
- Senator McCain's Post-Potomac Primary Presser
- The end of the beginning and a question for our co...
- Antonin
- Paul "refocused" on Congressional primary, still i...
- Obama time?
- Delegates
- Huck wins LA, KS. WA too close to call. Paul say...
- GOP candidates on judicial appointments
- Dem plan of attack against McCain
- Tampa Bay: The Midway Island of 2008
- McCain at CPAC
- Mittmentum..
- Super Tuesday
- Liveblogging Tsunami Tuesday
- Watch the results roll in
- What does it all mean?
- Final thoughts on Mega-Huge-Super-Duper Tuesday
- This made me laugh,
- They keep lining up...
- Thank you, Bill Kristol
- WOW
- Catholics for McCain
- Olson, Estrada back McCain
- Dem numbers
-
▼
February
(84)
2 comments:
Let's be honest: if Obama wins the nomination it's a problem. He will be tougher to run against, and if he wins the presidency it's all over. He has the most liberal voting record in the Senate (left of Hillary, if that's possible), and it will be coupled with a Dem congress.
A suggestion on how to take on Obama, by highlighting his voting record to emphasize his liberalness, is here.
More MSM attack on Obama and his hollow rhetoric.
Also here.
Both of these slam Obama for claiming to be about "change", yet offering nothing new beyond the standard Dem grab bag of tricks.
For example:
Barack Obama vowed to abide by the public finance campaign-spending rules in the general election if his opponent did. But now he’s waffling on his promise. Why does he need to check with his campaign staff members when deciding whether to keep his word?
Obama says he is practicing a new kind of politics, but why has his PAC sloshed $698,000 to the campaigns of the superdelegates, according to the Center for Responsive Politics? Is giving Robert Byrd’s campaign $10,000 the kind of change we can believe in?
If he values independent thinking, why is his the most predictable liberal vote in the Senate? A People for the American Way computer program would cast the same votes for cheaper.