Monday, February 25, 2008
If Ralph Nader falls in a forest, does he make a noise?
So, Nader's in. The question is, does it matter? Initially I was quite optimistic that this might be just the push necessary to derail the Dems and give McCain a better cushion for victory. This is especially so because so many people are still in the undecided category (at least 10% in almost every major poll).
However, my best guess is that it might not matter for three reasons. First, I think the Dem turnout will be at record levels this year, so as Obama said even if Nader peels off a few votes, it won't affect them. Second, the support for Obama (and Hillary to a lesser extent) are so strong that I don't see them losing many votes to Nader. Third, and perhaps most importantly, I doubt many Dems (even far lefties) are willing to blow this election by wasting a vote on Nader and handing us the victory. They saw what happened in 2000, and as a result Nader's vote total was microscopic in 2004. I think it potentially could be even lower this go around.
That said, I am still hopeful that perhaps Nader could play spoiler. One potential way is that once the Dems pick their nominee, if the other candidate's supporters are bitter perhaps they'd consider voting for Nader. For example, Hillary supporters may have such a dislike for Obama at this point that they'd consider Nader. But that seems like a slim long shot.
However, my best guess is that it might not matter for three reasons. First, I think the Dem turnout will be at record levels this year, so as Obama said even if Nader peels off a few votes, it won't affect them. Second, the support for Obama (and Hillary to a lesser extent) are so strong that I don't see them losing many votes to Nader. Third, and perhaps most importantly, I doubt many Dems (even far lefties) are willing to blow this election by wasting a vote on Nader and handing us the victory. They saw what happened in 2000, and as a result Nader's vote total was microscopic in 2004. I think it potentially could be even lower this go around.
That said, I am still hopeful that perhaps Nader could play spoiler. One potential way is that once the Dems pick their nominee, if the other candidate's supporters are bitter perhaps they'd consider voting for Nader. For example, Hillary supporters may have such a dislike for Obama at this point that they'd consider Nader. But that seems like a slim long shot.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Always sniffing for the truth
Contributors
Links
- Love and Lunchmeat
- Long Island Prepper
- Fredo's Mets Blog
- Continental Sausage
- Human Events
- Maker's Mark
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Newt Gingrich
- NRO
- Pro Ecclesia
- Ralfy's Whisky Reviews
- Red Albany
- Res Publica et Cetera
- Sour Mash Manifesto
- Straight Bourbon
- Taki Mag
- The American Conservative
- The American Spectator
- The Anchoress Online
- The Politico
- The Weekly Standard
- Wild Turkey Bourbon
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(731)
-
▼
February
(84)
- Just Another Hollywood Bimbo, Only Dumber
- The troop surge in Iraq is working
- Some insightful anthropology
- Obama's rhetoric is a strength.
- Check out the new Obama pic in the sidebar
- Gamecock stuffs his PC-police dossier ...
- Buckley on Iraq
- Not another dime to the MSM.
- A note to contributors
- Mason-Dixon FL poll
- This is an O!bamanation
- Obama-McCain
- Veep Watch #7: Mark Sanford
- Veep Watch #6: Charlie Crist
- Veep Watch #5: Fred D. Thompson
- Good news/bad news
- I can add little but my profound gratitude
- Obama! for a strong defense
- McCain VP
- Veep Watch #4: Tim Pawlenty
- Yes He Can
- Veep Watch #3: Rudy Giuliani
- McCain v. Obama
- Veep Watch #2: Tom Ridge
- The Lion of Good Government
- A bit of advertising from pg 1 of today's Journal:
- The Rage is Indescribable
- Anthropogenic global warming is real.
- Ironic
- This ship is sinking fast The Ship Be Sinking
- If Ralph Nader falls in a forest, does he make a n...
- Huckabee gets the final word in
- Barack Obama
- Hackabee
- Amen, Brother
- Obama on Cuba
- Say Hello to...
- Rise of the Obamatons
- Ice, Ice, (O)Baby
- A little more background on the Times flap
- And the beat marches on...
- Coining a new term
- Michelle Obama
- McCain v Obama: current polls
- Veep Watch: Condi?
- The coming chaos: Dem convention edition
- Fredo's Mad Money Challenge - Final Results
- Happy Birthday, D.C.
- It's already starting
- McCain throws down the gauntlet
- A Churchillian Republican
- "Super" Bowl?
- Romney endorsement?
- Time of death - call it
- Just to Make Sure We're All on the Same Page
- "Straight Talk"?
- Gearing up
- 2044
- 2012
- Obama supporters: creative little buggers
- Senator McCain's Post-Potomac Primary Presser
- The end of the beginning and a question for our co...
- Antonin
- Paul "refocused" on Congressional primary, still i...
- Obama time?
- Delegates
- Huck wins LA, KS. WA too close to call. Paul say...
- GOP candidates on judicial appointments
- Dem plan of attack against McCain
- Tampa Bay: The Midway Island of 2008
- McCain at CPAC
- Mittmentum..
- Super Tuesday
- Liveblogging Tsunami Tuesday
- Watch the results roll in
- What does it all mean?
- Final thoughts on Mega-Huge-Super-Duper Tuesday
- This made me laugh,
- They keep lining up...
- Thank you, Bill Kristol
- WOW
- Catholics for McCain
- Olson, Estrada back McCain
- Dem numbers
-
▼
February
(84)
1 comments:
Q: Nader's in. The question is, does it matter?
A: No.
For every reason you listed. And the fact that Obama/Hill are running well to the left of where Gore ran in 2000, making the raison d'etre of Nader's run inconsequential.
Plus, this is his third run. That is the very definition of stale, old, inconsequential news. Nader may not outdraw right-wing minor party candidates like the Constitution Party and the Libertarian Party.